All research

Report · Oil markets · Refining & products

Are US Crude Inventories Running Low, and What Does It Mean?

In mid-October 2026, US commercial crude stocks were 3.3% below their five-year seasonal average and falling at a time of year when they usually rise. This team report tests the explanations in turn: production, trade, product demand and price.

Co-authored with Michael Wu, Fergus Lyle, Keira Nygaard, Monty Brown, Tomas Hernandez and Audrey Levin Kim.

A team report by the 6:05 Markets oil and gas desk. Individual sections of the published report are credited to the analysts who wrote them.

Full report: 22-minute read.

Oil markets

Stocks fell when they usually build

Million barrels

Actual change, 18 Sep–16 Oct 2026
−13.9
Historical seasonal average
+8.3

Four-week change in US commercial crude stocks, excluding the SPR, compared with the historical average for the equivalent four weeks.

EIA weekly data and seasonal comparison quoted in the November 2026 report.

Summary

In the week ending 16 October 2026, US commercial crude stocks excluding the Strategic Petroleum Reserve stood at 412.5 million barrels. That was 13.9 million barrels lower than on 18 September and 3.3% below the calendar-matched 2021–2025 average. Over the equivalent four weeks, stocks had historically risen by 8.3 million barrels on average. Inventories were therefore both below average and falling when they usually build, although the report is explicit that this does not establish an outright shortage.

The analysis examines domestic production, imports and exports, product demand and the price response. Strong refinery runs, driven by tight global distillate markets, and lower net imports account for most of the draw.

The base case over the following eight to twelve weeks was for inventories to stay below their seasonal average while refinery runs remained strong. Over a longer horizon the report expected draws to end by the first quarter of 2027 and stocks to rebuild through the rest of that year.

412.5m bbl
US commercial crude stocks excluding the SPR, week ending 16 October 2026
−13.9m bbl
Change in stocks over the four weeks from 18 September
−3.3%
Gap to the calendar-matched 2021–2025 average
93.4%
Latest refinery utilisation

Figures from EIA weekly data, as cited in the report.

Key findings

  1. Domestic production does not explain most of the draw. Hurricane Isaias removed roughly 2 million barrels of output in the week ending 9 October, well short of that week’s 8.6 million barrel fall in stocks, and stocks kept falling after output recovered.

  2. Net trade was the largest single contributor. Net crude imports averaged 1.88 mb/d over the four weeks to 23 October, down 0.74 mb/d on the preceding four weeks. The stock change is not explained by trade alone, and Kpler disputed the latest export estimate.

  3. Products were tighter than crude. Distillate stocks were about 9.3% below their five-year average and gasoline about 5% below, against 3.3% for crude.

  4. Inventories are a physical signal, not an automatic price forecast. WTI fell from US$103.54 to US$99.93 over the four weeks in which crude stocks dropped by 13.9 million barrels, which indicates that other factors were at work.

What would change the view

Would weaken the view

  • Within the eight-to-twelve-week horizon, supply recovers faster while refinery demand weakens, allowing US commercial crude stocks to rebuild.
  • US refinery runs pull back. The report names refinery utilisation as the indicator to watch and any pullback in runs as a primary catalyst for inventory rebuilding.
  • Middle East flows are disrupted, Russian refineries stay damaged and US refinery runs continue throughout 2027, so draws persist, stocks stay below average and the 2027 rebuild the report expected does not materialise.

Would move it either way

  • A persistent gap below the seasonal average would support WTI; a narrowing gap would weaken that price signal.

Conditions as set out in the report when it was published.

Data and approach

The analysis uses EIA weekly data, compares stocks with calendar-matched weeks in 2021–2025 and uses four-week averages to reduce weekly noise. It states the limits of those choices: the five-year window includes atypical years, product-supplied figures are a proxy for consumption, and a third-party tracker disputed one week’s export figure.

Sources

Read the full report for the complete analysis.

Read the full report at 6:05 Markets

Dated analysis from November 2026. Views reflect the information available at the time and have not been updated. Nothing here is investment advice.

Up nextCrude Is Returning. Diesel Isn’t: The Distillate Bottleneck in Global Oil MarketsReportRefining & products